Why it's so hard to find encrypted communication protocols in OT environments?

-

Most OT communication protocols lack encryption, primarily due to their legacy nature and the unique constraints of industrial environments. Here are 10 key reasons why most OT protocols are unencrypted and why replacing them with encrypted alternatives is challenging:

1. Legacy System Constraints

  • Many OT systems were designed decades ago, long before cybersecurity became a major concern.
  • Industrial protocols like Modbus, DNP3, and Profibus were built for reliability and simplicity, not security.
  • Older devices and controllers lack the processing power and firmware capability to support encryption algorithms.

2. Real-Time Performance Requirements

  • Industrial control systems (ICS) require low latency and deterministic communication to maintain real-time operations.
  • Encryption introduces processing overhead due to the time needed for encryption and decryption, which can lead to:
    • Delays in SCADA-to-PLC communication.
    • Slower response times in safety-critical systems.
  • This is unacceptable in industries where milliseconds matter (e.g., power grids, oil refineries).

3. Lack of Standardized Encrypted OT Protocols

  • Unlike IT, which has widely adopted TLS (HTTPS, SSH, etc.), the OT world lacks a unified, secure protocol standard.
  • Some encrypted versions exist (DNP3 Secure, OPC UA Secure), but they are not universally adopted.
  • Different vendors implement security differently, making interoperability difficult.

4. Backward Compatibility with Legacy Devices

  • Many OT networks still rely on older PLCs, RTUs, and SCADA systems that cannot support encrypted protocols.
  • Upgrading or replacing legacy devices to support encryption would require:
    • Full system replacements or expensive firmware updates.
    • Re-engineering the entire control system, which is risky and costly.
  • Since OT devices are designed to last 15–30 years, upgrades are rare and gradual.

5. Strict Vendor Lock-in and Proprietary Protocols

  • Many OT environments use vendor-specific, proprietary protocols (e.g., Honeywell’s LCN, Siemens’ S7 Protocol).
  • These vendors often do not provide encrypted versions of their protocols or charge high licensing fees for secure variants.
  • Switching to encrypted protocols may require an entire DCS or SCADA system replacement.

6. Air-Gapped and Isolated Network Assumptions

  • Traditionally, OT networks were assumed to be physically isolated (air-gapped) from IT and external networks.
  • This led to the belief that encryption was unnecessary since only trusted devices communicated over closed networks.
  • However, modern OT systems are increasingly connected to cloud services, IT networks, and remote access systems, making this assumption obsolete.

7. Operational Risk and Complexity of Upgrading

  • Many OT systems operate 24/7 in critical industries (e.g., nuclear power, oil & gas, water treatment).
  • Upgrading to encrypted protocols could:
    • Disrupt production and require costly downtime.
    • Introduce unexpected failures in automation workflows.
  • Because availability is the top priority in OT, companies avoid changes that could lead to operational disruptions.

8. Resource Constraints in OT Devices

  • Unlike IT systems with powerful CPUs and memory, PLCs, RTUs, and embedded OT devices have limited computing resources.
  • Strong encryption (e.g., AES-256, TLS) requires additional processing power and memory, which older devices lack.
  • Implementing encryption at the network level (e.g., via VPNs or gateways) is an alternative, but it increases system complexity.

9. Lack of Security Awareness and Regulatory Gaps

  • Many industrial operators prioritize reliability and safety over security.
  • Until recent years, cybersecurity regulations for OT (e.g., IEC 62443, NERC-CIP) did not mandate encryption.
  • Some industries still lack clear compliance requirements, leading to slow adoption of secure protocols.

10. Expensive and Complex Migration to Encrypted Protocols

  • Migrating to encrypted OT protocols requires:
    • Upgrading firmware and hardware across the entire control system.
    • Reconfiguring firewalls, IDS/IPS, and monitoring systems to handle encrypted traffic.
    • Testing and validation to ensure compatibility with existing automation processes.
  • This process is time-consuming, expensive, and risky, leading many organizations to delay or avoid the transition.

Conclusion: How to Improve OT Security Despite These Challenges

Although full encryption of OT protocols is difficult, organizations can still improve security by:

  • Using encrypted tunnels (e.g., VPNs, TLS gateways) for remote access.
  • Network segmentation to isolate critical OT devices from external threats.
  • Anomaly detection to identify unauthorized communication or command injection.
  • Patching and updating OT firmware where possible to add security features.
  • Implementing secure versions of protocols (e.g., Modbus TCP Secure, DNP3 Secure, OPC UA Secure) in new deployments.

#CPS #OT #XIoT #IoT #IIoT #IoMT #CPSSecurity #OTSecurity #IoTSecurity #CPS보안 #OT보안 #IoT보안

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Don't confuse DCS, PLC and SCADA in front of OT specialists

-
Image
DCS, PLC and SCADA are not the same. If you keep talking only about PLC security in front of the Oil&Gas industry executives where DCS is the main focus, they will not recognize you as a proper expert. We need to understand the characteristics of OT systems such as DCS, PLC, and SCADA accurately, also respect each OT culture uniquely and finally approach the sites in the right way. Don't be confused, here’s a clear and accurate explanation of DCS, PLC, and SCADA . 1. Distributed Control System (DCS) Concept A DCS (Distributed Control System) is an automated control system used for large-scale industrial processes that require continuous operation and high reliability. It consists of multiple controllers distributed throughout the system, which communicate with each other to manage complex processes. Key Features Used in large-scale, continuous processes (e.g., oil refineries, power plants). Decentralized control architecture with multiple controllers working together. Pr...
Read more

Top 20 Threat Scenarios & Playbooks for OT Security

-
Image
A comprehensive list of 20 threat scenarios in OT security along with detailed descriptions and detection rules that can help identify and respond to these threats. This playbook-style table covers different types of attacks—from unauthorized access to insider abuse—with corresponding rules and indicators to alert security teams. # Threat Scenario Detailed Description Detection Rules & Indicators 1 Unauthorized Remote Access Attempt An attacker uses stolen or weak credentials to access OT networks remotely. - Log Analysis: Monitor VPN/RDP logs for unusual login times, geolocation mismatches, and failed/successful login bursts. - User Behavior Analytics (UBA): Alert on deviations from normal remote access patterns. - Anomaly Detection: Trigger an alert when a remote session is initiated from an unusual IP or geographic region. 2 Malware/Ransomware Infiltration in OT Network Malicious code is introduced into the OT network via compromised endpoints or phishing, potentially encr...
Read more

Let's create our own ICS Labs in the VMs!

-
Image
Let's create our own ICS Labs in the VMs: A Step-by-Step Guide Building an Industrial Control System (ICS) lab in a virtualized environment allows security researchers, engineers, and penetration testers to safely simulate industrial networks, study threats, and test security defenses. Below is a detailed step-by-step guide to creating an ICS lab , including HMI, EWS, PLC, and other critical components. 1. Lab Architecture Overview Key Components in an ICS Lab: HMI: Graphical interface for controlling industrial processes. Engineering Workstation (EWS): Used to configure PLCs and SCADA systems. PLC: Controls physical processes (e.g., motors, valves). SCADA System: Supervisory control and monitoring of ICS networks. Historian: Logs and stores process data for analysis. Networking Components: Virtualized switches, routers, and firewalls to segment ICS networks. Attacker Machine: Kali Linux or Metasploit for penetration testing. 2. Choosing the Virtualization ...
Read more